The protection of creditors’ human rights and procedural guarantees is important and necessary in both enforcement and insolvency procedures. They are guaranteed in national constitutions and international treaties, in particular the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The purpose of this paper is to compare the position of the creditor in both types of procedures from a human rights perspective. In particular, it focuses on the procedural right to a fair trial (Article 6) and the substantive right to peaceful enjoyment of one’s possessions (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) as understood by the European Court of Human Rights. The article critically analyses its relevant case law, which, by interpreting both rights, defines the limits of national rules on enforcement and insolvency procedures.
Keywords
Enforcement Procedure, Insolvency Procedure, Right to a Fair Trial, Right to Property,
European Court of Human Rights
Received
August 14, 2026
Revised
August 14, 2026
Accepted
August 14, 2026
Published
April 19, 2025
Citation:
Lutman, K., & Pogorelčnik Vogrinc, N. (2025). The Human Rights Dimension of Creditors’ Position in Enforcement and Insolvency Procedures: Lessons to Be Learned From ECtHR Case Law DANUBE, 16(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2025-0001.
Lutman Karmen and Pogorelčnik Vogrinc Neža 2025. „The Human Rights Dimension of Creditors’ Position in Enforcement and Insolvency Procedures: Lessons to Be Learned From ECtHR Case Law“ DANUBE 16 (1): 1-15.
LUTMAN, Karmen a POGORELČNIK VOGRINC, Neža. The Human Rights Dimension of Creditors’ Position in Enforcement and Insolvency Procedures: Lessons to Be Learned From ECtHR Case Law DANUBE, 2025, roč. 16, č. 1, s. 1-15.
Lutman, K. and Pogorelčnik Vogrinc, N. (2025) ‚The Human Rights Dimension of Creditors’ Position in Enforcement and Insolvency Procedures: Lessons to Be Learned From ECtHR Case Law‘, DANUBE, 16(1), pp. 1-15.