Volume 8 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)

Public Participation and Democratic Legitimacy of Rulemaking – A Comparative Analysis

Iztok Rakar
Download article
Abstract

In recent years, public participation has been a frequent object of research, especially in relation to rulemaking procedures. The aim of the paper is to verify a common thesis, that public participation is a means for enhancing democratic legitimacy in rulemaking. In order to do so, the author defines legitimacy and legitimation, presents models of the democratic legitimacy of the executive and compares monistic and pluralistic understanding of democracy. The author then analyzes standpoints of American, English and German legal theory and case law and proposes a possible solution to the main research question.

Keywords
Rulemaking, Public Participation, Legitimacy, Democracy
Received
July 28, 2026
Revised
July 28, 2026
Accepted
July 28, 2026
Published
July 13, 2017

Citation:

Rakar, I. (2017). Public Participation and Democratic Legitimacy of Rulemaking – A Comparative Analysis DANUBE, 8(2), 57-77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2017-0005.
Rakar Iztok 2017. „Public Participation and Democratic Legitimacy of Rulemaking – A Comparative Analysis“ DANUBE 8 (2): 57-77.
RAKAR, Iztok. Public Participation and Democratic Legitimacy of Rulemaking – A Comparative Analysis DANUBE, 2017, roč. 8, č. 2, s. 57-77.
Rakar, I. (2017) ‚Public Participation and Democratic Legitimacy of Rulemaking – A Comparative Analysis‘, DANUBE, 8(2), pp. 57-77.